Will AI Finally Break Capitalism? A Look to the Future
Now, having sat through countless governmental meetings at all levels over the decades, listening to discussions on economic policy and reform, I’ve come to realize that we’re falling behind massively in the age of AI. The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence demands a rethink of our traditional economic frameworks to avoid being left in the dust or ultimately…..unemployed.
We stand on the brink of a technological revolution powered by artificial intelligence, the ensuing questions in this regard are: How is AI’s ability to replace human labour (on a much larger scale than ever before) going to impact the very foundations of a capitalist system that has become intrinsically rooted in human labour and human consumption?
This is my view point of the pressing challenges I can foresee; AI presents to traditional economic models, including potential disruptions in tax systems and a move closer toward zero marginal cost. It is, again, all with the view to pushing policymakers and the general public toward the consideration of change from a forward-looking perspective, which encourages early adoption to some of these unavoidable changes.
Subscribe to get my stories directly by email.
The Current State of Capitalism and AI
At its core, capitalism relies on a straightforward cycle: businesses employ human labour to produce goods and services, which are sold to consumers who spend their wages to sustain and propel this cycle. Yet, this age-old mechanism is under threat from AI and automation, technologies capable of executing tasks with a level of efficiency, pace and cost-effectiveness unachievable by human workers.
Key Challenges of AI
AI might be changing the landscape with the inclusion of it into major industries. For one, AI displaces human work, meaning a hit to the number of consumers on a wage. This then disrupts the consumption pattern that capitalist economies are dependent on. For example, automated manufacturing and AI-driven services produce goods with fewer employees, which cut labour costs but also slashes the purchasing power of the masses.
Other than this, even in areas such as transport, customer service, and now even health care, the trend toward automation is evident. This poses not only questions of employment for millions but questions of the very sustainability of a consumer-based growth model. If an ever-diminishing number of people can’t find employment, there can be a significant decrease in the aggregate demand that drives businesses and, therefore, economic growth. This then brings us to a very key question: if today’s workers are not tomorrow’s consumers, what will fuel capitalism?
Apart from this having implications in the economic sense, it also has social ones. As the elimination of job roles occur, this difference in job market requirements and the general skills of the workforce is sure to become more pronounced. Such discrepancies could contribute to great economic and social disparity. Training and education programs will always be behind the rapid change that AI can effect, so much of the general population will be left behind in a world moving forward at an ever greater pace in terms of technology.
Moreover, the introduction of AI to the workforce, at the expense of human workers, provokes ethical and governance questions. The pace at which AI is likely to spread across each sector may be greater than the time taken in the development of regulatory frameworks, thus resulting in exploitation and inequality of opportunities. Policymakers will need to find the path toward creating new regulations and safety nets to make sure growth is fair and that workers are properly protected. The productivity that AI-driven growth will unleash will be at one pole, whereas the core of capitalism — employing humans — will shrink. The economic principles and strategies need rethinking for the sustainability of growth after labour.
It is in the way we face these challenges that the answers lie about how our economies are going to be modeled in the years to come.
Threatened Economic Models
The reliance of governments on labour taxes to fund public services may come under serious pressure as AI reshapes job markets. The expanding automation of tasks may further diminish the traditional tax base based on the incomes of human workers until it threatens a fiscal crisis in those states that rely on that revenue. This throws into sharp focus the more general question about what form of taxation corporations are likely to take in a largely AI world. Perhaps, as firms potentially yield more profits due to low labor costs, the novel tax strategies by the government take the form of levies on AI operations or on data use to maintain public service funding.
In addition, Yanis Varoufakis has expressed similar worries about a new economic model that he has been calling ‘Technofeudalism,’ in which a handful of large tech companies dominate both the economy and the data on which it operates to an even greater extent. Society might drift that way as people are increasingly subscribing to the services and goods of a few big firms, with no need of services of the traditional state. Such an evolution is fraught with peril: less equality and no democratic control over the most important services are the antithesis of the concepts of fairness public accountability.
The Shift to a Zero Marginal Cost
Through the theory of zero marginal cost, a discussion by economic theorist Jeremy Rifkin, AI and automation are about to make this a reality. Zero marginal cost refers to the marginal cost of producing an additional unit of a good or service once fixed costs have been absorbed, trending towards zero with scaling AI and technologies. This is going to change most constructs in economies today, as it could actually make goods and services pricing much cheaper, maybe even glutting some places with goods.
This, however, poses profound challenges to the profit margin and cost-based pricing strategies of traditional business models. In a society with almost zero marginal cost, the essence of companies just may not be there anymore as prices fall and AI commoditizes practically everything. In this sense, the probable impact is that it will provoke major restructuring in market dynamics, new consumers benefiting from lower prices, and big firm and industry disruption that cannot adjust to this new economic environment.
Adapting to Change
As AI continues to advance, the need for proactive adaptation by both individuals and governments increases in importance. It does indicate a need for educational systems to evolve, to prepare future generations with the competencies they require for a high-tech job market.
This means that policymakers should come up with forward-looking strategies on how to manage changes that have arisen from AI in the economic and social sectors, ensuring sound public safety nets.
There must be an increase in public awareness and engagement with these matters so that societies are well-informed and can partake actively in the establishment of these future economic models.
The hope for this future lies in the collective ability to harness the potential of AI to drive more equitable growth and wealth distribution, along with a wave of broad-based benefits from technological change through society.
Enjoying my articles?
1. Like and comment — I try to reply to everyone.
2. Follow Me Here or on LinkedIn
